Pershing 82 Engine Options (2012 - 2020) Compared
MTU 16V 2000 M96 vs MTU 16V 2000 M96L vs MTU 16V 2000 M93
-
- Model Name:
- Quantity:
- Manufacturer:
-
Performance Data
- Output (bhp):
- Output (kw):
- Speed (rpm):
- Bore:
- Stroke:
- Max Speed:
- Cruising Speed:
- Eco Speed:
- Drive Type
- Engine Specification
- No' of Cylinders:
- Cylinder displacement:
- Valves:
- Alternator output:
- Battery charging capacity:
- Width:
- Combustion Parameters
- Fuel consumption:
- Aspiration:
- Dimensions
- Total displacement:
- Mass:
- Other
- In production:
-
-
-
Option #2
-
-
2
-
-
2,600bhp
-
1,939kw
-
Max 2,450rpm
-
5.31"
-
6.14"
-
50 Knots
-
42 Knots
-
10 Knots
-
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
50.91"
-
-
-
-
-
9 Gallons
-
7,605.94lbs
-
Yes
-
-
-
Option #3
-
-
2
-
-
2,400bhp
-
1,790kw
-
Max 2,450rpm
-
5.31"
-
6.14"
-
46.5 Knots@ 2,400 rpm275nm range239.1 GPH
-
42.8 Knots@ 2,250 rpm273nm range222 GPH
-
10.2 Knots@ 1,000 rpm496nm range29.1 GPH
-
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
50.98"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8,769.98lbs
-
No
-
-
